| 
 | 
						Beauty of CrucifixionA 
						number of qualities come to mind when I view a woman 
						crucified. The first is her own beauty; a cross 
						stretches her limbs and tightens her tummy. It thrusts 
						her breasts out, and often since she is raised a few 
						feet off the ground, her breasts are right at eye (and 
						tongue) level. If she is a little higher, then her pussy 
						is within direct licking range. Depending on the 
						arrangement, it either makes her perfectly symmetrical, 
						her arms spread wide, and her hips facing flat, her legs 
						laid long; or it directly exposes her sex to whatever 
						lust desires.
 Second, I love to watch how a woman who is crucified 
						copes with the pain. Since the whole point of a 
						crucifixion is pain, you need a slave who not only can 
						handle the pain, but who can also internalize it. A good 
						slave lets the pain reverberate back out in a tortured 
						form of expression, either moans, or pleas, whimpers, 
						groans, or a writhing effect. The only part of the body 
						free to move, the head, is interesting to watch too. For 
						instance, I love to see how a slave's head turns and 
						looks over their various hurts, and how they eventually 
						shake their hair to accommodate one last degree of 
						personal control.
 Third in the sense of qualities is control. The cross, 
						in one sense to me, represents a position of enforced 
						discipline. There were times when I've condemned a slave 
						to be crucified in order to punish them. There were 
						other times when I crucified them for no apparent reason. 
						At these times, aesthetics might be a suitable 
						explanation, if such is needed, but always below the 
						surface is that element of control. The control effect 
						consists not only of the period when the slave actually 
						feels the wood, but the period afterwards when I can use 
						the fear of going through the ritual again to change 
						their behavior.
 During this phase, when the slave hangs on the cross, I 
						love to examine all the contrasts declared by the body 
						when set against the harshness of the cross. First, her 
						skin is soft, delicate, and warm; the wood is hard, 
						thorny, and cold. Second, her curves flow smoothly all 
						around, the richness of her face and eyes, the 
						loveliness of her breasts and nipples, versus the strict 
						linear phallic intentions of the pole. The rippling of 
						her muscles as she struggles against the bonds and 
						gravity also intrigue me. I like to see a slave writhe, 
						I want to see them struggle, I like when they inevitably 
						invite me to take them down by offering me their body 
						openly... and to that, I say 'no', 'fuck you' or rather, 
						"I'll let the cross fuck you". I like to degrade their 
						pretty or sophisticated features by letting them writhe 
						in agony and wallow in pain, despair, agony, and shame, 
						even perhaps watching as urine dribbles over the whip 
						marks of the insides of their thighs.
 In fact, this is probably the most erotic and esoteric 
						side of the whole crucifixion for me: the contrast 
						between the 'hard' and the 'soft'. The pain of a Roman 
						crucifixion caused the victim to oscillate between 
						hanging from the spikes in their arms to standing on the 
						spike in their feet. From a short distance away, this 
						would appear to be a little dance, up and down, without 
						end, and infinitely dreadful. In other sense, you can 
						say that a slave is literally being fucked by a big 
						wooden dick for everyone to see. And worse of all, it's 
						their own strong leg muscles that do that fucking.
 This leads to the second big phase of my interest in 
						crucifying women. During my radical feminist stage of 
						the mid-seventies, I often clashed internally over my 
						intense sexually dominant personality and my overt 
						equally intense struggle for equal rights for women. 
						Strangely enough, the feminists who I went to bed with 
						found this interesting, but one woman showed me a 
						reference that sent my head spinning. There was a 
						growing movement in the theoretical aspects of feminism 
						at the time to discredit any male influenced 
						philosophies. One of the criticisms made concerned the 
						sexual proclivities of famous philosophers. One theorist, 
						Mary Daly, postulated that all male philosophers 
						masturbated to the images of women crucified, and worse 
						yet, she actually had evidence from some of their wives. 
						After their deaths, their wives or archivists had 
						stumbled upon their personal collections of pornography. 
						Reels upon reels of black and white film from the early 
						parts of the century showed where these philosophers 
						had filmed grad students or lovers or even their wives 
						crucified in hundreds of positions.
 Tarquinius Rex
 
 |